🔗 Share this article

An activist organization has claimed to have scraped a vast number of songs from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to release them publicly.

Possible Boost for Artificial Intelligence Development

Industry experts noted the apparent leak could aid AI companies searching for material to develop their technology.

An entity called Anna’s Archive said it had obtained 86 million music files from Spotify and 256 million entries of metadata such as performer and record names. The company, which hosts more than 100 million songs, stated that the breach did not represent its entire catalog.

“We have located and deactivated the nefarious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” said a company representative.

The Swedish company, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, added that an investigation into unauthorized access identified a third party collected public metadata and used illicit methods to circumvent DRM [digital rights management].

Archive's Declared Mission and Concerns

Spotify does not think the audio acquired by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to copyright-infringing books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group claimed the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music streamed to by Spotify users and would be distributed via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a means of sharing large data files online.

“Naturally the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great start,” said Anna’s Archive, which frames its purpose as “preserving humanity’s information and heritage”.

Model Development and Intellectual Property Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artists’ copyright, said the leaked music would probably be utilized for training AI models.

“Training on pirated data is sadly widespread in the tech sector, so this accessed music is highly likely to end up training AI models,” he stated.

The Anna’s Archive site makes references to LibGen, a vast online archive of copyrighted books that has allegedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to develop its AI models.

A founder of an artificial intelligence company wrote on LinkedIn that members of the public could in principle “build their own private free version of Spotify”. The executive said it could also allow technology firms to “train on contemporary music at scale”.

Copyright has become a battleground between creatives, authors and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other.

Government Considerations and Reactions

Across Britain, artists and writers have protested against a government suggestion to allow AI companies use copyright-protected work without consent unless the rights holder opts out. Virtually every participant to a government call for evidence on the proposal has supported artists’ concerns.

A government minister for science, research and development informed parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the issue, noting that ministers would “take the time to get this correct”. The government has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.